2005年度 パッヘ研究奨励金T-A-2(特定研究助成・特別)研究成果報告書

  
氏名 Potter, David 所属 総合政策学部総合政策学科
研究課題 Rethinking Foreign Aid and Public Opinion

研究実績の概要
  I noted in the application for this stipend that in previous reseach I have come across references to public opinion as a potential variable that may affect foreign aid decision making. Public opinion about foreign aid is frequently reported in official documents in donor countries and international organizations, such as the OECD. There exists, however, practically no research that systematically compares public opinion on aid across countries except at the most superficial level. Practically all comparative studies of public opinion and foreign aid simply ask either whether the public supports current levels of foreign aid spending or how much the public in each country knows about foreign aid. Questions about the impact of public opinion on geographic and sectoral distribution of aid, quality of aid, etc. go unanswered.
  During the stipend period I gathered public opinion polls related to foreign aid from Japan, the United States, Australia, the European Union, Ireland, Norway, and Sweden. A graduate student assisted in the collection and collation of that data. I also investigated previous scholarly research on the topic. Analysis of the kinds of foreign aid questions public opinion polls ask citizens in each country presented an insurmountable obstacle to the original research question. Simply put, there is very little that can be compared across national public opinion polls beyoud crude measures of public support for aid. Comparative research on the impact of public opinion on geographic and sectoral distribution of aid, quality of aid, etc. are impossible using the polls governments now use. Most polls (Japan's are an exception) do not even ask these questions. Rather, each set of polls tends to ask questions specific to the polling agency or the country. I have detected no sense of common purpose across polls, especially between countries.
  These results have led me to rethink the entire project. Instead of asking what publics think about a series of issues in foreign aid, it is more fruitful to ask why governments ask the questions they do. In other words, are there consistent differences among national polls on foreign aid? Are there consistent differences between officail polls and private polls? If so, why is this? I expect to publish the results of this new research in Academia, with longer discussions submitted to peer-reviewed journals. I expect to continue to expand this research in future.

「雑誌」の部 「図書」の部
@ 論文題目 "Japan's Economic Assistance in the Iraq War" @ 書名  
雑誌名 『アカデミア』人文・社会科学編 出版社  
巻号 第82号 巻号  
発表年月 2006年1月 発表年月  
ページ pp.453-471 ページ  
著者名 David M. Potter 著者名  
備考   備考  
A 論文題目   A 書名  
雑誌名   出版社  
巻号   巻号  
発表年月   発表年月  
ページ   ページ  
著者名   著者名  
備考   備考  
B 論文題目   B 書名  
雑誌名   出版社  
巻号   巻号  
発表年月   発表年月  
ページ   ページ  
著者名   著者名  
備考   備考